Office design is where science & art break even

by Fleming. Team

There is a strong connection between employees' satisfaction with the work environment and their level of engagement. One can say it is like building bridges between people and places, senses and spaces...

Europe HR

Smart Workspace Design Summit

Visit event website

There is a strong connection between employees' satisfaction with the work environment and their level of engagement. One can say it is like building bridges between people and places, senses and spaces. The impact of place on the employee can be physical (light; view outside; portable and wearable technology), perceptual (attitude; wellbeing), financial (absence; turnover; retention; medical costs) and psychological (cleanliness; old buildings are not very spacious or ecological).

While productivity and psychological perceptions are often dependent variables, we can influence independent indicators such as furniture, lightning, temperature, noise and some spatial variables.

Since the dawn of the white-collar age, office designs have overcome changing attitudes: openness versus privacy, interaction versus autonomy, the team versus individuality. And the demands have changed over the years, as Wired magazine describes in an article from 23rd March 2009:

1. Taylorism (1904) – American engineer F. Taylor crowded workers together in a completely open environment while bosses looked on from private offices, much like on a factory floor. While Taylor stands behind the birth of industrial engineering and the efficiency movement, no man is a machine and no employee wants to work in a lined up row of clerical workers in a large room. And if he has to, let's make it as pleasant as we can.

2. Bürolandschaft (1950) – The German office landscape brought socialist values to workplaces. The layout stayed undivided, but bosses were no longer in executive suites, to make chatting easier. It was intended to provide a more collaborative and humane work environment, often decorated with plants and carpet. Also, the allocation of space per employee compared to other models was not quite ample, but generous. The hope was to encourage disclosure and debate.

3. Action Office (1968) – The American furniture company Herman Miller created the first modular business furniture system, with low dividers and flexible work surfaces. If you know the award-winning TV show Mad Men, you know what we are talking about. Still in production today and widely used, you probably know the “Action Office” by its generic, more sinister name: the cubicle. Even designer Robert Propst called it “monolithic insanity.” Today, many companies are going back to the pre-cubicle rows of desks.

4. Cube Farm (1980) – It's the cubicle concept taken to the extreme and known as the “sea of cubicles”. Sounds humorous… And you probably read Dilbert comics, right? Cube farms were popular even later, in 2000, because of the so-called dotcom boom in the US. And too many still work in a sea of cubicles, despite the clear signs of how ineffective they are. When you put “effective cubicle” into a Google search, among the first five results you can find sentences such as: “The saddest office cubicle we could find,” “Workers hate their cubicles,” or “Death of the cubicle.”

5. Virtual Office (1994) – Ad agency TBWA\Chiat\Day's LA headquarters was a Frank Gehry masterpiece. But the interior, dreamed up by the company's CEO, was a fiasco. It introduced the idea of “hot-desking,” which meant that employees had no designated desk; you grabbed a laptop in the morning and raced to claim a seat. People were new to this and the company gave up on this experiment after 4 years. Yes, Jay Chiat was ahead of his time, but we can see it only now, when everyone is working on their iPad, in company relax zones and everyone is crazy about Google's offices full of color, slides, scooters and foosball tables. A great example of changing from old ways to new and getting used to it (or not), is another American TV show, Happyish. If the workspace does not fit you, you end up being “happyish” and somewhat productive.

6. Networking (present) – During the past decade, furniture designers have tried to part the sea of cubicles and encourage sociability: for example, systems with movable, semi-enclosed pods and connected desks whose shape separates work areas. We are moving to our homes (home office), virtual reality (virtual offices), startups are using business incubators and some professionals are skipping it all and freelancing.

The role of the workplace is evolving and becoming more crucial. Some people imagine 40 years from now as an era where the typical 09:00 to 17:00 is a thing of the past, as is the traditional office space.For example, according to OECD stats, in the year 2000 the average annual hours per worker in Korea was 2 512 and in the year 2014 it was 2 124 hours. And we can see the same declines of more than 200 hours in Latvia, Iceland, Hungary, Austria...

The imagined workplace of 2040 will be radically different and redefined by several factors, Marie Puybaraud, expert in the field of Workplace Innovation, states in her article published at For example:

1. No set hours as long as the work is done.

2. Networks are fundamental – cloud, crowdsourced or interactive.

3. Location change – working from home, incubators or alternative venues.

4. Well-being – health and avoiding burnout will be critical.

Interested in this topic?

More articles


To be, or not to be, local-plus

A successful compensation strategy involves keeping expatriates motivated while maintaining a competitive advantage by achieving a company’s corporate goals and budgets. While in theory this seems achievable, in practice there are many challenges with expatriate compensation that cause problems for companies. Many are in a battle to win external talent, and to retain internal talent. At the same time, cost pressures to reduce the expense of international assignments is increasing. The balance-sheet approach is expensive relative to the fact that a very small proportion of a company’s overall total employee workforce (e.g., perhaps 5 percent of employees in total) may be incurring 60 or 70 percent of total salary costs. Not surprisingly, for many years this was a major reason why expatriates agreed to go. There is also the tax equalization expense when assignees relocate from low tax to high tax countries.


Global mobility – a competitive advantage for international business

Despite the stop/start nature of the global economic recovery, one thing that is perennially on the agenda of CEOs and HR leaders is the war for talent. McKinsey in their latest Quarterly Review (1) suggest that ‘progress towards globalisation’s new era will be uneven for economies and companies alike’. Knowledge in the new intangible assets world will certainly mean power. In the digital global age there will inevitably be a demand for new breeds of talent – emanating from both emerged and emerging countries.


All change? Global mobility’s role towards 2020

In this White Paper Santa Fe assess the on-going debate about the role of global mobility within organisations; should they aim to be more strategic, and if so how should they go about doing so? We draw from both the RES Forum Annual Report 2015 and Santa Fe Global Mobility Survey 2014 and 2015 and in addition, other industry research and sources as well as academic research.