Speaker's blog: How text analytics is changing the employee survey

by Andrew Marritt

​The use of text analytics in HR will be discussed in detail by our speaker Andrew Marritt, who is the founder of OrganizationView, a Swiss-based people analytics practice, at the HR Analytics online conference.

In my last post, I discussed the process by which employee engagement increases and decreases and therefore what are the most effective interventions leaders can use to make a long-term difference. In this post, I explore the related question - what do we need to change?

As People Analysts, OrganizationView have conducted a lot of surveys over the last six years. One thing we’ve come to appreciate is how important employees’ open text comments are to driving action from management. The issue has usually been how to deal with tens of thousands of comments, provided in multiple languages. This was one of the driving forces behind our decision to develop Workometry, our employee feedback platform.

Europe HR

HR Analytics

Visit event website
Before the advent of reliable text analytics, analysing these comments at scale was time and cost prohibitive. The way that employee surveys have developed has largely been influenced by this constraint. However, just as statistics has been changed by the availability of large, easily available computing power and cheaper acquisition costs for data, we predict that our understanding of employees will be changed by the availability of text analytics.

With text, there are two main tasks that we want to do: we want to categorise the text into one or more topics and we might want to score the text on some sort of scale, for example, by level of sentiment.

When categorizing, we want to go further than just words. We look at two dimensions - the topic (e.g., ‘career development’) and the context (e.g., ‘shortage’). This has to be more than just keyword as we’ll want to link together the multiple synonyms - it’s the meaning not the words that they’ve chosen which is important.

Doing this adds metadata to our text. We can then apply various statistical techniques to the metadata. Typically, we identify in the region of 40–60 different topics for any text question. We can think of this as equivalent to adding another 40–60 scale questions to a survey. Therefore, we can ask the short surveys that are needed to maintain response rates when you’re doing them frequently whilst capturing very rich data. We use an unsupervised learning approach meaning that the topics are suggested by the data, not precoded based on generic results.One of the reasons that we do analysis is to draw attention to the parts of the information that managers need to focus on. We’re currently doing that by combining two techniques.Read the complete blog post and much more from Andrew Marritt here.

Interested in this topic?

More articles


To be, or not to be, local-plus

A successful compensation strategy involves keeping expatriates motivated while maintaining a competitive advantage by achieving a company’s corporate goals and budgets. While in theory this seems achievable, in practice there are many challenges with expatriate compensation that cause problems for companies. Many are in a battle to win external talent, and to retain internal talent. At the same time, cost pressures to reduce the expense of international assignments is increasing. The balance-sheet approach is expensive relative to the fact that a very small proportion of a company’s overall total employee workforce (e.g., perhaps 5 percent of employees in total) may be incurring 60 or 70 percent of total salary costs. Not surprisingly, for many years this was a major reason why expatriates agreed to go. There is also the tax equalization expense when assignees relocate from low tax to high tax countries.


Global mobility – a competitive advantage for international business

Despite the stop/start nature of the global economic recovery, one thing that is perennially on the agenda of CEOs and HR leaders is the war for talent. McKinsey in their latest Quarterly Review (1) suggest that ‘progress towards globalisation’s new era will be uneven for economies and companies alike’. Knowledge in the new intangible assets world will certainly mean power. In the digital global age there will inevitably be a demand for new breeds of talent – emanating from both emerged and emerging countries.


All change? Global mobility’s role towards 2020

In this White Paper Santa Fe assess the on-going debate about the role of global mobility within organisations; should they aim to be more strategic, and if so how should they go about doing so? We draw from both the RES Forum Annual Report 2015 and Santa Fe Global Mobility Survey 2014 and 2015 and in addition, other industry research and sources as well as academic research.